Introduction
For centuries, we’ve been taught that the Earth is a spinning sphere. But is that truly the case? Flat Earth theory presents a radically different perspective, challenging everything we thought we knew about our world. In this article, we explore the contrasting arguments between the two theories and examine which might hold more weight.
Mainstream Science: The Case for a Globe
From ancient Greece to modern-day space missions, the globe theory has been upheld by centuries of scientific evidence. Photos from space, the curvature seen on the horizon, and the Coriolis effect all point to the Earth being spherical.
Flat Earth: The Case for a Flat Plane
Flat Earth proponents argue that the evidence for a globe is fabricated, offering observations like the horizon always appearing flat, water’s level behavior, and the lack of visible curvature from high altitudes. The theory posits that the Earth is flat, with an ice wall surrounding it, and questions the validity of satellite images.
Conclusion
Both sides have compelling arguments, but the search for the truth continues. The debate is more than just scientific—it’s philosophical. Are we open to questioning everything we’ve been taught?
